It is almost impossible to force oneself to read the Washington Post’s brilliant reporting of the US failure to respond adequately to the Russian election-related hacking.
However, attention must be paid, and the implications go far further than judgements about the Obama administration, that I am sure will go well explored in classic blame the victim manner.
First, I think we have to admit that the current situation of a largely unpunished and undeterred coup/attack on the US has to be broadly blamed on the entire political process in the US. While the lack of response, either public or covert, is hard to defend either now, or then, it has to be seen as in part the product of the hyper-politicization of foreign policy. The Obama administration was operating in a toxic environment in which any honest reporting or respect was, and would be thrown back in the face of the government and the electorate, without any concern for considerations other than short term victory. The administration could not ignore the reality of that environment.
That must be recognized as a product of Trump active encouragement of hacking, of his trivialization of any reporting, and of his contempt for truth. The enablers carry as much if not more of the blame.
Second, we must be honest about where we are. We no longer can be confident that the American people control our own fates through the political process. It was and has to be assumed to be about to be again, another Pearl Harbor. (That the US has its own long bi-partisan history of interference in other counties electoral, and political processes, not to mention coups, does not make this any less serious, it only makes it harder to defeat.) Given the massive reluctance of Trump to take this threat in any way seriously, or even to recognize the risks of the legitimacy this has already lost him, we can have no faith that the governmental system will protect us against more and worse future surrenders of control. (If Trump is forced out, as I strongly believe he has to be, and will be, this last is no longer true, but issues of trust and legitimacy will long remain.)
Finally, we have to build a new layer of institutions that protect the integrity of our political system regardless of short term interest. For a start, I can imagine a Commission led by prior presidents, with an independent staff, with direct access to the intelligent services. The Commission would have a mandate to issue public reports, including on the credibility of challenges to our democratic electoral system, and to publicly and privately urge actions of all kinds, thereby making it easier for presidents to take needed actions without being effectively accused of putting partisan interests first. While hacking will be one part of the charter of duties, all forms of foreign interference and collusion will need to be included.
The problem, as always, and as we learned in the cold war, is that is is almost impossible to give groups power that is not democratically constrained without then in fact surrendering democracy to those powers. In the absence of the consensus of the cold war years, the need is even greater than it was then, and the risks are far greater.
It is a measure of what Trump and his enablers have wrought, and what his opponents have failed to do, that we now face this choice.